Haemostatic responsiveness and release of biological response modifiers following cryopreservation of platelets treated with amotosalen and ultraviolet A light

Abstract

Background. Due to the risk of replication of contaminating pathogens, platelets have a limited storage time of 5 days, which can be prolonged to 7 days by the use of pathogen inactivation technologies. Cryopreservation (CP) may be an alternative to permit longer storage periods and increased availability. However, the preparation of platelets can result in secretion of biological response modifiers (BRM), which can cause adverse transfusion reactions in the recipient. We investigated the impact of CP on platelet function and release of BRM in untreated (conventional) and pathogen-inactivated (PI) platelet concentrates.
Materials and methods. Twelve buffy coat-derived platelet units were treated with amotosalen and ultraviolet A light to inactivate pathogens. Twelve untreated units were used as controls. The 24 units were cryopreserved and in vitro variables were analysed before and after CP. The in vitro variables investigated included platelet surface receptors and activation markers by flow cytometry, and coagulation time by viscoelastography. A panel of BRM, including cytokines, was investigated.
Results. CP of both conventional and PI platelets resulted in a significant increase of BRM with similar increases of most of the BRM after CP of conventional and PI platelet concentrates. The increase in some of the BRM correlated significantly with shortened coagulation time, increased P-selectin expression, reduced mitochondrial transmembrane potential, and reduced capacity to respond to stimulation with ADP and collagen.
Discussion. Cryopreservation of both conventional and PI platelets results in secretion of BRM. The increase in some of the BRM correlated with changes in platelet function variables and suggests that BRM release is affected, in part, in a similar way by CP as are changes in platelet function variables. PI with amotosalen and ultraviolet A light in combination with CP did not affect the release of immunomodulatory factors more than CP alone did.