Original article

Blood Transfusion - 1 2022 (January-February)

Effectiveness of the HCV blood screening strategy through eighteen years of surveillance of HCV infection in blood donors in France

Authors

Key words: HCV, blood donations, NAT, viral load
Publication Date: 2021-05-12

Abstract

Background -  The question of maintaining blood screening based on both Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection antibodies (Ab) and Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) has been raised in several countries. The French blood donor surveillance database was used to address this issue.
Materials and methods - In France, HCV-NAT was implemented in mini pools (MP) in 2001 and in individual testing (ID) in 2010. HCV-positive donations are further investigated including detection of RNA with an alternative polymerase chain reaction assay: Amplicor HCV v2.0 (Roche; LOD95 50 IU/mL) from 2001 to 2006 and CobasTaqMan (CTM) HCV 2.0 assay (Roche; LOD95 9.3 IU/mL) since 2007.
Results - From 2001 to 2018, 3,058/48.8 million donations were confirmed HCV positive: 64.4% were Ab+/NAT+, 35.1% Ab+/NAT− and 0.5% Ab−/NAT+. From 2001 to 2018, the NAT yield decreased from 0.65 per million donations to 0, and NAT+ donations dropped from 77% to 46% of the total of HCV donations. 2,491/3,058 were further tested for HCV-RNA: 1,032 (816 NAT+, 216 NAT−) with Amplicor and 1,459 (897 NAT+, 562 NAT−) with CTM. Four (3 MP and 1 ID-NAT, 0.5%) of the 778 NAT negative donations had low viral loads.
Discussion - The decline in HCV-NAT yield cases raises the question of the relevance of NAT. Conversely, the increase in Ab+/NAT− donors, suggesting a growing number of resolve infections, argue for Ab discontinuation. In our experience, at least 0.5% of Ab+/NAT− donations had low RNA level when retested. Although the risk of viral transmission by such donations is probably low, the uncertainty associated with their infectivity goes against the removal of Ab in blood screening in our country.

Downloads

Authors

Pierre Cappy - Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine (INTS), Département des Agents Transmissibles par le Sang, Centre National de Référence Risques Infectieux Transfusionnels, Paris, France

Laure Boizeau - Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine (INTS), Département des Agents Transmissibles par le Sang, Centre National de Référence Risques Infectieux Transfusionnels, Paris, France

Daniel Candotti - Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine (INTS), Département des Agents Transmissibles par le Sang, Centre National de Référence Risques Infectieux Transfusionnels, Paris, France

Rémi Caparros - Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine (INTS), Département des Agents Transmissibles par le Sang, Centre National de Référence Risques Infectieux Transfusionnels, Paris, France

Quentin Lucas - Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine (INTS), Département des Agents Transmissibles par le Sang, Centre National de Référence Risques Infectieux Transfusionnels, Paris, France

Eliane Garrabe - Centre de Transfusion des Armées, Clamart, France

Christophe Martinaud - Centre de Transfusion des Armées, Clamart, France

Sophie Le Cam - Etablissement Français du Sang, La Plaine St-Denis, France

Pierre Gallian - Etablissement Français du Sang, La Plaine St-Denis, France; Unité des Virus Émergents, (UVE: Aix-Marseille Univ-IRD 190-INSERM 1207-IHU Méditerranée Infection), Marseille, France

Pascal Morel - Etablissement Français du Sang, La Plaine St-Denis, France; UMR 1098 RIGHT, Inserm, EFS, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France

Josiane Pillonel - Santé Publique France, Saint Maurice, France

Syria Laperche - Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine (INTS), Département des Agents Transmissibles par le Sang, Centre National de Référence Risques Infectieux Transfusionnels, Paris, Franc

  • Abstract viewed - 291 times
  • PDF downloaded - 128 times